|
|
Baumgartner, S., & Monnet, A. (2007). Integration und Lebensqualität : Untersuchung zur aktuellen Lebenssitutation von ehemaligen Klienten und Klientinnen einer stationären Drogentherapie. Master's thesis, Berner Fachhochschule, Bern.
Keywords: treatment and maintenance; inpatient care; master thesis
|
|
|
|
Kleeb, B. (2000). Kundenorientierung in der Drogentherapie : Auswirkungen der Kundenorientierung auf die sozial-pädagogische Arbeit in der stationären Drogentherapie. Master's thesis, Fachhochschule Aargau, .
Keywords: treatment and maintenance; inpatient care; patient; master thesis
|
|
|
|
Barman, J. - D., Berthel, T., Burkhardt, A., Durgnat, H., Egli, T., Gut, P., et al. (2003). Gegenwart und Zukunft der stationären Suchttherapie : Bericht zur Nationalen Fachtagung vom 8. November 2002 = Actualités et futur des thérapies résidentielles : rapport de la journée nationale du 8 novembre 2002 (N. Dietrich, F. Eckmann, U. Simmel, & M. König Setiadi, Eds.). Bern; Berne: Schweizerische Koordinationsstelle für stationäre Therapieangebote im Drogenbereich (KOSTE); Centrale de coordination nationale de l'offre de thérapies résidentielles pour les problèmes de drogues (COSTE).
Keywords: treatment and maintenance; inpatient care
|
|
|
|
Dietrich, N., & König Setiadi, M. (2004). Thérapie et méthadone en milieu résidentiel : au carrefour des repésentations et des pratiques : rapport de la journée du 18 novembre 2003 à Bulle. Berne: Centrale de coordination nationale de l'offre de thérapies résidentielles pour les problèmes de drogues (COSTE).
Keywords: treatment and maintenance; inpatient care; methadone maintenance; Switzerland; drug substitution therapy
|
|
|
|
Grichting, E., Hampson, D., Lezzi, S., & Dobler-Mikola, A. (2000). Nachbefragung der im Jahr 1997 ausgetretenen Klientele stationärere Drogentherapien : Gesamtauswertung. Zürich: Institut für Suchtforschung (ISF); Forschungsverbund stationäre Suchttherapie (FOS).
Keywords: treatment and maintenance; inpatient care
|
|
|
|
Schaaf, S. (2006). Substitutionsbehandlung im Rahmen stationärer ausstiegsorientierter Suchttherapie in der Schweiz : Literaturüberblick : Bestandesaufnahme Klientendaten 2003/2004 : Institutionsbefragung zur Substitutionspraxis in stationärer Therapie. Zürich: Institut für Sucht- und Gesundheitsforschung (ISGF).
Keywords: treatment and maintenance; inpatient care
|
|
|
|
Institut für Suchtforschung. (1998). MIDES stationär : modulares Instrument zur Deskription von Suchtbehandlung stationär. Zürich: Institut für Suchtforschung (ISF).
Keywords: treatment and maintenance; inpatient care
|
|
|
|
Institut de recherche sur la toxicomanie. (1999). MIDES résidentiel : instrument modulaire pour la description de traitements résidentiels contre la toxicomanie. Zurich: Institut de recherche sur la toxicomanie (ISF).
Keywords: treatment and maintenance; inpatient care
|
|
|
|
De Leon, G. (1997). Community as method : therapeutic communities for special populations and special settings (various, Ed.). Westport: Praeger Publishers.
Abstract: This book presents adaptations of the therapeutic community (TC) model and method for special populations of substance abusers, and implementation in a variety of institutions and human service settings. Included are pregnant adult addicts and their children, adolescents, prison inmates and parolees, the homeless, and chronically ill clients in methadone treatment. The settings include community residence and transitional housing facilities, state prisons, county jails, homeless shelters, mental hospitals, inpatient wards and outpatient clinics, as well as community based treatment programs.
Keywords: treatment and maintenance; inpatient care
|
|
|
|
Rawlings, B., & Yates, R. (2001). Therapeutic communities for the treatment of drug users (E. Broekaert, S. Raimo, M. Kooyman, G. De Leon, C. F. Lloyd, F. V. O'Callaghan, et al., Eds.). London: Jessica Kingsley.
Abstract: This multi-author review by British editors is divided into background, history and current situation, ‘life-in’, variations on the model and, finally, research and evaluation. Multi-authorship has led to overlaps. It was pleasing to see the early pioneers described as ‘charismatic free-thinkers...imbued with ideological viewpoints and passion...experimenting’. Were there no evidence-based practice protocols? Within a referenced history, there are ample quotes from residents outlining the changes leading to the ‘new therapeutic communities’. Central throughout have been the Encounter Groups with the experience evolving; the move from behaviour modification to social learning, from confrontation to motivation. Also, there is the tension between professional input and the focus of the community being ‘self-help’ and ‘here and now’, plus the gradual erosion of insider/outsider divisions, to becoming part of the wider community. Authoritive, prescriptive and inflexible chapters are balanced by more personal portraits of therapeutic communities. Alan Woodham’s closing personal view of working in a therapeutic community is not covered elsewhere, yet needs to be heard by those thinking of this field or funding these groups. As for residents’ experiences, Keith Burnett provides a flowing association of thoughts with quotes from individuals. He addresses the problem of high drop-out rates, and offers solutions, not just leaving the responsibility on the ex-resident as being ‘not motivated’. Examples of how to, and how not to, set up a therapeutic community in prison, are given. Re-integration within the community has been neglected for too long and Paul Goodman and Karen Nolan give a frank view of resettlement. The chapter by Barbara Rawlings on evaluation, essential in any review, is an overview of the evidence beyond ‘improvements were greatest for those that stayed the longest’. Edle Ravndal gives details of one outcome study in Norway showing a methodology which others could well copy if they wish to remain financially sound.
Keywords: treatment and maintenance; inpatient care
|
|
