Toggle visibility Search & Display Options

Select All    Deselect All
 |   | 
Details
   print
  Record Links
Author (up) Hunt, Neil; Ashton, Mike; Lenton, Simon; Mitcheson, Luke; Nelles, Bill; Stimson, Gerry url 
  Title A review of the evidence-base for harm reduction approaches to drug use Type Report
  Year 2003 Publication Abbreviated Journal  
  Volume Issue Pages 79  
  Keywords harm reduction; health and disease; risk; AOD use, abuse, and dependence; HIV infection; Aids; viral hepatitis; hepatitis B; hepatitis C; AOD overdose; AOD use and driving; AODR crime; AODR violence; needle distribution and exchange; prison; sex worker; treatment and maintenance; drug substitution therapy; heroin-assisted treatment; cost (economic); cost-effectiveness; education; injection room; motivational interviewing; physical and chemical analysis and measurement; international area  
  Abstract This document, from Forward Thinking on Drugs, details the theory and practice of harm reduction and evaluates its effectiveness. The first section of the document outlines what harm reduction is, including its main principles, and addresses key criticisms. The second section of the document outlines key harm reduction interventions, including: needle and syringe programmes; methadone and other replacement therapies; depenalisation; information, education and communication; safer injecting and other drug consumption rooms; and motivational interviewing. The paper outlines three key findings from the evidence. Firstly, harm reduction works, especially methadone and other replacement therapies, and needle and syringe programmes. The author argues that these should be considered for adoption in regions where they are currently unavailable. Secondly, harm reduction programmes show promise and require cautious, monitored, and locally adapted expansion. Finally, the author finds that harm reduction interventions are widely used yet under-researched, especially those which include information, education and communication programmes, and motivational interviewing approaches to conventional harm reduction targets such as HIV prevention. The author concludes that the best response is to develop better evidence in order to discard approaches that do not work and develop and disseminate those that do.  
  Address  
  Corporate Author Thesis  
  Publisher Forward Thinking on Drugs Place of Publication London Editor  
  Language English Summary Language Original Title  
  Series Editor Series Title Abbreviated Series Title  
  Series Volume Series Issue Edition  
  ISSN ISBN Medium  
  Area Expedition Conference  
  Notes Approved no  
  Call Number 50-t Serial 56047  
Permanent link to this record
Select All    Deselect All
 |   | 
Details
   print

Save Citations:
Export Records: